Global Trade Alert

Fri, Jul 03 2009
tags
trade
g20
protection
transparency


Global Trade Alert website

Just before the London G-20 Meeting in April, Andy Stoler and I wrote a paper for a booklet published by the Center for Economic Policy Research in which we suggested that the best way to make G-20 governments live up to their promises was to expose their misdeeds on trade policy—including those that nominally complied with their WTO obligation—using a public website.

Specifically, we recommended that the site should not be run by one of the global institutions (WTO, World Bank) that are owned by governments, but should be a private venture open to contributions from individuals around the world. Why? Well, as the FT notes, in an editorial today, sovereigns are not likely to put much pressure on themselves:

"The problem with naming and shaming wrongdoers is that, all too often, they turn out to be shameless." Extract from Financial Times

I am delighted to learn that the co-editor of the booklet (Simon Evenett) and the publishers (CEPR) have created just such a website: Global Trade Alert. It has been launched in the past couple of weeks with the backing of institutional sponsors (government funds, mostly) and an advisory board of distinguished analysts. GTA already lists a couple of dozen measures with useful details including the trading partners and tariff lines affected (for goods measures).

A nicely implemented and potentially intriguing experiment in global transparency. Please visit and contribute.

Your thoughts?…

Critical mass agreement vs the Doha Round

Thu, Jul 02 2009
tags
wto
agriculture
doha
trade framework


Projected welfare impacts of a CM agreement on agriculture

We'll cut to the chase, shall we, in this fourth of my posts on modeling the impact of a 'critical mass' agreement in agriculture? Click on the tags at the left-side or at the bottom of this article to find the earlier posts.

A 'critical mass' agreement among 38 countries that account for 80 percent of world trade in the 30 top-traded agricultural products (all of them food) to eliminate import duties on those products would achieve about two thirds of the projected value of the global Doha agreement on agriculture. If the members of the CM eliminated production and export subsidies, too (turns out, they won't have much choice) the global gains would be a third as much again as those projected for the Doha agreement.

Click the thumbnail to see the results in a table. A brief explanation of the table: the CM-35 scenario assumes that 3 of the potential members of the critical mass agreement decide not to join. They are China, India and Indonesia. As you can see the projected 'static' global welfare impact is actually slightly larger if they stand-back because China and India (especially) would benefit from the opportunity to 'free ride' on the open markets of the other 35 countries.

 Read moreRead more

Let’s hope this means more clarity

Fri, Jun 26 2009
tags
agriculture
doha
usa


Trade ministers in Paris for the June OECD meetings are looking for Lamy's 'second track' to a Doha deal.

"U.S. Trade Representative Ron Kirk called for a new approach to the Doha talks, involving direct negotiations with key trading partners as the traditional multilateral format was not working…'We think getting more clarity around that ['exactly what the U.S. would gain'] may be the key to helping us find a solution to a way forward,' Kirk said after a meeting of ministers at the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)." Extract from Reuters via Portfolio.com

Lamy did not mean—as this news report suggests—that the 'second track' would be series of bilateral deals. That's a long-standing U.S. fallback position (from the days of GATT), but I doubt Kirk had that in mind either. Here's the official account of what he said.

By the way, isn't it great to see that USTR has finally dumped that crappy old web-site and has adopted the much more accessible Obama-Whitehouse (or, maybe, Vivek Kundra) style?

Your thoughts?…

Manufacturing copyright ‘consensus’

Fri, Jun 26 2009
tags
evidence
copyright
consensus
coalitions of interest


The path to copyright consensus in Canada

A fascinating analysis of a 'coalition of interest' at work—strategies often alleged but rarely detailed with such clarity.

Geist shows how three Canadian entertainment industry organizations have manufactured the appearance of widening concern over copyright piracy and growing evidence of its impact.

"It is not just that these reports all receive financial support from the same organizations and say largely the same thing.  It is also that the reports each build on one another, creating the false impression of growing momentum and consensus on the state of Canadian law and the need for specific reforms" Extract from Michael Geist

Geist notes that experienced politicians seem to understand what's going on here. That's to be expected: this is nothing more than an elaborate, effective and, in the scheme of things, acceptable lobbying strategy.

But that knowledge doesn't shield polticians—or the public debate—from the misrepresentation of either the data or the 'consensus' unless the insight is widely shared. Few make the effort that Geist has made to evaluate either.

Your thoughts?…

Opening food markets in a CM agreement

Wed, Jun 24 2009
tags
agriculture
trade framework
model
critical mass


Breughel Banquet

The immediate net global gains from a 'Critical Mass' (CM) trade agreement to open markets for some 30 products in 38 of the world's largest markets would be about $10 billion. World trade in these products would expand by a third with most of the export gains won by developing countries.

This is the third post in a series of five intended to share with you the results of some simulations of an alternate approach to reducing harmful levels of protection in world food markets. The Doha Round of WTO trade negotiations has got itself into a terrible tangle over that goal, becoming "a knotty mass of rules for cutting barriers, rules for compensating the barrier cuts, rules for making exceptions to the barrier cuts, and provisions adding exceptions to the exceptions."

The simulated CM agreement I describe in this post has a more limited product and country coverage than the proposed Doha Round. But—in the next post—I'll compare it to a projection of the Doha Round deal using the same economic model. I think you'll be surprised by how well it stands up.

 Read moreRead more

A Critical Mass Agreement on cereals trade

Wed, Jun 17 2009
tags
trade framework
model
critical mass
cereals


VanGoghWheatField.gif

In this post I'll describe the simulated impacts of a Critical Mass (CM) trade liberalization agreement on global trade in cereals. This is the second of five posts about some simulations I've created to investigate whether CM agreements could be an alternative to the standard WTO approach to opening up world markets for agriculture.

The bottom line: an improvement in global welfare of between $3.4 billion and $5.5 billion ($US 2006) depending on how the CM agreement is configured. 'Global welfare' means, roughly, the sum of changes (positive or negative) in three asset classes: producer revenues, government taxes and value for consumers. A surprising result is that India turns out to be one of the biggest winners in terms of net trade flows (excess of exports) whether it participates in the agreement or not, but its welfare gains are small because producers' gains are all but offset by consumers' losses.

I'll look at the results of the cereals CM agreement, first. At the end of this post I'll describe the advantages and limits of the ATPSM model that I've also used to simulate liberalization of a much broader range of commodities. More about the bigger results in later posts along with some ideas about how you can use the ATPSM model to create your own simulations.

 Read moreRead more

Investment barriers stuff-up China relations

Mon, Jun 15 2009
tags
china
investment
resources


No one I know seriously questions the importance of China to Australia's external balances, especially now in the trough of a recession. Nor can we have any doubts about China's growing political, cultural and 'strategic' importance for us and our region of the world. So why would a government led by sinophile make such a terrible, embarrassing, stuff-up of its response to a proposal from a top Chinese resources company to deepen our commercial relationship?

John Garnaut bluntly explains in today's Fairfax press what a hamfisted, mis-aimed blow the denial-by-delay in the Chinalco-Rio case has dealt our relations with the Chinese government and top Chinese commercial management. How wooden-headed and inept is our commercial diplomacy to give the impression that Australia disdains commercial integration with China when our official objective—and our real, considered objective, I'm confident—is absolutely the converse?

Considering both the tiny trickle of Chinese investment flows (below) to Australia and the top priority that China has in our foreign policy, this error-of-omission beggars belief.

 Read moreRead more

Modeling ‘critical mass’ trade agreements

Mon, Jun 15 2009
tags
wto
agriculture
trade framework
model


38682_tmb.jpg

In the past couple of weeks, I've been modeling the economic impacts of an alternative way to open up world agricultural markets using 'critical mass' trade agreements.

I thought I would share some of the results of the modeling with you, here on my website, over the next couple of weeks.

The simulations run inside the trade model suggest that there would be huge wins from adopting a new, more practical approach to the knotty old problem of opening up food markets that has so far stymied WTO. But the economic gains are not necessarily where you might expect to find them and they raise some questions about the likely interests of the giant emerging economies of India and China.

Also, I thought you might like to learn how to make your own economic model of changes in world agricultural trade trade policies, even if—like me—you don't have the data or the mathematical background that modern economic models require. I'll show you how I went about building a model of the impacts of the proposed Doha Round agreement on world trade in agriculture.

 Read moreRead more

Readers pay for publishers’ protection

Tue, Jun 09 2009
tags
copyright
books


Joshua Gans seems to agree with me that access to low-cost Kindle e-books is one reason to get rid of the ban on competitive ('parallel') import of books.

"So why is it possible for hard copies of books to move across international borders but not electronic copies? The answer is that publishers, who have intellectual monopolies over these works, for their own reasons have not done the deals to make it possible. " Extract from The Age

He suggests that publishers could try a 'fair trade' pricing scheme for local publishing. But they do that already.

Your thoughts?…

Budget transparency turns murky

Thu, May 28 2009
tags
data
finance
transparency


So much for the Government's "Operation Sunshine" that was supposed to make budget program expenditure more transparent and accountable.

On the biggest single program item, Defense—a staggering 2.3% of GDP or $27 billion dollars next year alone—it seems to be a case of re-negging and obscurity.

"As the first budget after a new Defence White Paper, there is a glaring absence of substantive information on funding, investment and reform. The best that can be said is that the budget is consistent with a White Paper that’s silent on when anything will occur or what things will cost. All we are offered is a vision of what the defence force will look like in 2030." Extract from Australian Strategic Policy Institute

The ASPI's chief analyst has described the Budget papers as "deliberately vague".

Your thoughts?…

Two tracks out of the Doha wasteland?

Thu, May 28 2009
tags
wto
agriculture
doha
critical mass


Pascal Lamy wants to stir up more action in the WTO's Doha negotiations —at least its appearance—by opening up a 'second front' for the exchanges. One group will battle on to refine the technical rules and one will start a 'show and tell' exploration of the implementation of the rules.

"My own sense is that there is scope to work on these two areas along two simultaneous tracks. One would see technical engagement in the negotiating groups move to a higher gear to cover a number of technical issues as mentioned previously. Simultaneously, Members would start some sort of ‘outcome testing’, through bilateral or plurilateral discussions, where they would provide each other with greater clarity on the use of flexibilities and through it, on the value of the deal." Extract from Lamy's address to the WTO General Council meeting

But if the problem is that a large number of countries are reluctant to engage at all, how will widening the front lead to an earlier outcome?

 Read moreRead more

U.S. breaks G-20 promise on trade

Sun, May 24 2009
tags
agriculture
g20
subsidies


noChange.gif

Just to remind you of what they said in April:

"We reaffirm the commitment made in Washington not to raise new barriers to investment or to trade in goods and services, including within existing WTO limits, not to impose new trade restrictions, and not to create new subsidies to exports." G-20 Communiqué emphasis added

By any measure the re-introduction of an export subsidy for the coddled U.S. dairyfarmer is a new subsidy, even if within the terms of the 1994 WTO agreement on subsidy ceilings (cooked-up by the USA and EC in 1992). It's outrageous and damaging. But foreseeable.

"The US Agriculture Department said it will subsidise about 92,000 tonnes of dairy products headed for the world market. A spokeswoman said the subsidies would help US farmers hit by plunging international prices and trade volumes and was the first time in five years the program would be used." Extract from The Age

Your thoughts?…

Risk and liberty

Sat, May 23 2009
tags
ideas
risk


WhatPriceLiberty_x6_tmb.gif

Interesting new book "What Price Liberty" from UK academic, Ben Wilson. You can download the book from the publishers (Faber & Faber) from now until 4 June for whatever price you think it's worth.

Nowadays states regard the individual as a potential troublemaker, a selfish economic actor who puts personal gain first: a risk in other words.

 Read moreRead more

Plimer review: more from G Schmidt

Sat, May 23 2009
tags
climate
evidence
model
science


Dr Gavin Schmidt has further criticisms of my review of Plimer (and of Plimer's book). I'm happy to reproduce them as emailed (presuming again that he has no objection). He has three main points concerning the Wegman 'cluster' analysis of the Mann authorial relationships; whether the Hockey Stick article was a 'fraud', and; whether Plimer's account of paleo-climate variability matters to current concerns.

 Read moreRead more

U.S. and Global Temperatures: a correction

Fri, May 22 2009
tags
climate
data
temperature
statistics


Corrected GISS record shows 1934 as the hottest year

Dr Gavin Schmidt, a climate modeler at NASA and a principal author of the Real Climate weblog, has emailed me to point out an error (mine) in my review of Ian Plimer's Heaven + Earth.

I said that I had learned from Ian Plimer that NASA had reversed it's claim that the ten years following 1995 were the hottest ten years of the century when Steven McIntyre showed that the record belonged to 1934. But, as Dr Schmidt points out, 1934 was the hottest year in the GISS records only for the United States, not in the global GISS records. He goes on to accuse Prof. Plimer of 'lying' to his readers about this, and other, matters.

I am grateful to Dr Schmidt for pointing out this error, which I have corrected. But I still share Ian Plimer's amply-documented conclusion that there is no reason for alarm about the slight warming that undoubtedly took place over a fifty year period from the 1940s.

 Read moreRead more

Scary pictures of a deep recession

Tue, May 19 2009
tags
data
recession


Fall in employment (USA) this recession and 1981 Fall in output (USA) this recession and 1981

From the Federal Reserve of Minneapolis, these charts comparing output and employment trends in this recession compared with all post-war recessions in the United States. No sign of bottom here.

The charts are interactive. You can pick your own poison, if you follow the link.

Your thoughts?…

Plimer’s Heaven + Earth

Mon, May 18 2009
tags
climate
evidence
carbon
book


Heaven+EarthThumb.png

I have finally finished reading and skimming Ian Plimer's thick book Heaven + Earth. I found it admirable for being a comprehensive and intelligent account of relevant evidence on climate change. I did not like it so much for the writing, or for the organization of ideas in some places, but that's a quibble in light of the book's strengths.

Prof. Plimer's book looks like a text book (and weighs about as much), but in reality it is a piece of rhetoric. He has collated a very strong argument, based on the record of scientific enquiry, for rejecting the case—already flimsy on the grounds of common sense—for climate alarm.

 Read moreRead more

Two strikes from recession, not three

Sat, May 16 2009
tags
trade
data
recession
macroeconomics


Australia's terms of trade have soared

Lindsay Tanner's claim reads like part of a narrative that has been prepared by the Rudd government.

"The challenge for the government now is that whereas Hawke and Keating had ’86 terms of trade, ’87 stock market crash, ’90 recession, we’ve had all three, in effect, within the space of about a year and all feeding off each other in various kind of negative synergy ways." Extract from Business Spectator interview with Finance Minister Lindsay Tanner

But the three-strikes story isn't true.

 Read moreRead more


Earlier Entries

You'll find a complete list of entries here. You could also search by keywords.