The Quiet Coup

If you can't let the banks fail and won't take over their assets, they own you.

"[W]e face at least two major, interrelated problems. The first is a desperately ill banking sector that threatens to choke off any incipient recovery that the fiscal stimulus might generate. The second is a political balance of power that gives the financial sector a veto over public policy [owing to the Geitner plan's reliance on banks' cooperation], even as that sector loses popular support." Extract from Simon Johnson, "The Quiet Coup", The Atlantic Online

Would an IMF 'lender of last resort' program—usually reserved for emerging markets in crisis—help the United States?

In a word: no. This is the price of that 'exorbitant privilege'…

To paraphrase Joseph Schumpeter… everyone has elites; the important thing is to change them from time to time. If the U.S. were just another country, coming to the IMF with hat in hand, I might be fairly optimistic about its future. Most of the emerging-market crises that I’ve mentioned ended relatively quickly, and gave way, for the most part, to relatively strong recoveries. But this, alas, brings us to the limit of the analogy between the U.S. and emerging markets.

Emerging-market countries have only a precarious hold on wealth, and are weaklings globally. When they get into trouble, they quite literally run out of money—or at least out of foreign currency, without which they cannot survive. They must make difficult decisions; ultimately, aggressive action is baked into the cake.

But the U.S., of course, is the world’s most powerful nation, rich beyond measure, and blessed with the exorbitant privilege of paying its foreign debts in its own currency, which it can print. As a result, it could very well stumble along for years—as Japan did during its lost decade—never summoning the courage to do what it needs to do, and never really recovering. A clean break with the past—involving the takeover and cleanup of major banks—hardly looks like a sure thing right now. Certainly no one at the IMF can force it.

The 'optimistic' scenario (there's a worse one)

The conventional wisdom among the elite is still that the current slump "cannot be as bad as the Great Depression". This view is wrong. What we face now could, in fact, be worse than the Great Depression—because the world is now so much more interconnected and because the banking sector is now so big. We face a synchronized downturn in almost all countries, a weakening of confidence among individuals and firms, and major problems for government finances. If our leadership wakes up to the potential consequences, we may yet see dramatic action on the banking system and a breaking of the old elite. Let us hope it is not then too late.

The whole article repays reading. Ben Muse drew my attention to it.

Tags for this entry: trade policy macroeconomics imf banks financial schumpeter